When you invest in the finest fitness tracker, you can accurately track and monitor your fitness goals like your daily activities and the number of calories you burned in a day. Today you will come across many popular activity trackers in the market such as the Fitbit, Nike Fuel Band, Jawbone UP24 and the Garmin Vivofit. These are trendy-designed motion sensors which communicate with your smartphones through the Bluetooth technology. You can decide which fitness tracking device is best suited for you after carefully assessing the pros and cons of the two more popular fitness tracker brands Fitbit and Garmin Vivofit.
Fitbit Vs Garmin Vivofit:
Features: The Garmin Vivofit is relatively new priced at $130. This has a lightweight rubber band which is available in many different vibrant colors. There is a single button which allows the user to cycle through the date, calories, steps and heart beats when you have connected the wireless heart rate monitor strap. The device comes with a LCD screen which displays one thing at one time.
Battery life: Unlike the Fitbit products, the Garmin Vivofit guarantees an extended battery life. While the other fitness bands need to be charged within a week, this will continue for a whole year after which you can replace batteries yourself. The Fitbit must be charged once every week through a special dongle which is costly when you have to replace it.
Waterproof: Unlike the Fitbit, the Garmin Vivofit is waterproof which allows the user to keep it on even in the shower. The other fitness trackers in the market like the Fitbit Flex and Nuke Fuel Band SE are all water-resistant but not waterproof. The Vivofit can stay safe up to 50 meters below the water making it suitable for use even when swimming.
Interface: The Vivofit can track distance, steps and even your workout details with the help of a heart-rate monitor. If you remain sedentary for a long time, a red colour bar appears to prompt you. Compared to the other fitness trackers, the Garmin Vivofit is said to have the simplest user interface. The wireless heart-rate monitor allows the user to import data directly into the app. The working is not complicated or fancy and users can hope to get accurate results. You do not need phones to sync the data.
Comfort: The Fitbit comes in a small compact size with a rubbery band which is high on comfort. The Garmin Vivofit also has an easy-to-clasp system which sits easily on your wrist.
Both these fitness trackers have impressive features and cloud-based portals that allow you to view the data. Both are trendy looking and integrate with MFP. When you are not in any need of a heart-rate monitor, you can only benefit from the Garmin Vivofit’s display. The Fitbit Flex offers many silent alarms which you will not find in the Vivofit. For people wanting to lose weight only, the Fitbit works brilliantly. For those wanting something more the Garmin is preferable because it shows your BPM and your heart zone vitals even without a phone. The Fitbit has a simple app which is reliable and sync continuously in the background. There is no push to do anything like a red colour bar to nudge you to work out when you are sedentary. The Garmin Vivofit in comparison is advantageous for those who view their fitness goals more seriously.
Fitbit Vs Garmin Vivofit:
Features: The Garmin Vivofit is relatively new priced at $130. This has a lightweight rubber band which is available in many different vibrant colors. There is a single button which allows the user to cycle through the date, calories, steps and heart beats when you have connected the wireless heart rate monitor strap. The device comes with a LCD screen which displays one thing at one time.
Battery life: Unlike the Fitbit products, the Garmin Vivofit guarantees an extended battery life. While the other fitness bands need to be charged within a week, this will continue for a whole year after which you can replace batteries yourself. The Fitbit must be charged once every week through a special dongle which is costly when you have to replace it.
Waterproof: Unlike the Fitbit, the Garmin Vivofit is waterproof which allows the user to keep it on even in the shower. The other fitness trackers in the market like the Fitbit Flex and Nuke Fuel Band SE are all water-resistant but not waterproof. The Vivofit can stay safe up to 50 meters below the water making it suitable for use even when swimming.
Interface: The Vivofit can track distance, steps and even your workout details with the help of a heart-rate monitor. If you remain sedentary for a long time, a red colour bar appears to prompt you. Compared to the other fitness trackers, the Garmin Vivofit is said to have the simplest user interface. The wireless heart-rate monitor allows the user to import data directly into the app. The working is not complicated or fancy and users can hope to get accurate results. You do not need phones to sync the data.
Comfort: The Fitbit comes in a small compact size with a rubbery band which is high on comfort. The Garmin Vivofit also has an easy-to-clasp system which sits easily on your wrist.
Both these fitness trackers have impressive features and cloud-based portals that allow you to view the data. Both are trendy looking and integrate with MFP. When you are not in any need of a heart-rate monitor, you can only benefit from the Garmin Vivofit’s display. The Fitbit Flex offers many silent alarms which you will not find in the Vivofit. For people wanting to lose weight only, the Fitbit works brilliantly. For those wanting something more the Garmin is preferable because it shows your BPM and your heart zone vitals even without a phone. The Fitbit has a simple app which is reliable and sync continuously in the background. There is no push to do anything like a red colour bar to nudge you to work out when you are sedentary. The Garmin Vivofit in comparison is advantageous for those who view their fitness goals more seriously.